What Is Decision Theory? Why Does It Matter For Your Financial Future?

We all like to think we're rational when making financial decisions. Yet, reality often tells a different story. Traditional economic theories assume we act as rational agents, carefully weighing the pros and cons of each choice to maximize our financial well-being. However, real-world decisions are influenced by emotions, biases, and mental shortcuts that can lead us astray.

This is where decision theory comes in. By understanding the foundations of decision-making, the psychological factors behind it, and the biases that shape our choices, we can make more informed and strategic financial decisions.

A Brief History of Decision Theory

Decision theory is a multidisciplinary behavioral science field that explores how individuals, groups, and systems make choices, especially under conditions of uncertainty. Combining elements from probability, economics, and philosophy, it attempts to understand how decisions are made and provide models for decision-making. 

Decision Theory Origins

The origins of decision theory trace back to the 17th and 18th centuries with the emergence of probability theory, pioneered by Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat.

A key milestone in decision theory came in the 18th century when Daniel Bernoulli introduced expected utility theory to resolve the St. Petersburg Paradox—a mathematical puzzle questioning why individuals might reject a gamble with an infinitely high expected value. Expected utility theory posits that individuals choose options that maximize their expected utility by assessing the probability of different outcomes and their corresponding benefits. Bernoulli’s insight was that people don't make decisions based solely on potential gains, but instead, they assess the utility or perceived value of an outcome. He also introduced the concept of marginal utility, which, in the context of finance, suggests that as wealth increases, the additional satisfaction gained from more money diminishes.

Modern Decision Theory

Today, there are two major branches of decision theory: normative decision theory and descriptive decision theory. Normative decision theory examines how decisions should be made based on rational principles, assuming perfect information and the goal of maximizing utility. It aims to model the ideal decision-making process. A key model in normative decision theory is expected utility theory. Descriptive decision theory, on the other hand, examines how people actually make decisions, highlighting deviations from rational models due to cognitive limitations, biases, emotions, and heuristics (mental shortcuts). An example of descriptive decision theory is prospect theory.

Expected utility theory assumes that people are rational decision-makers. But as real-world observations show, people don’t always make rational choices. This gap in traditional decision theory set the stage for the development of prospect theory in the 1970s, which fundamentally changed our understanding of decision-making.

Prospect Theory: Why People Don’t Make Rational Financial Decisions

Prospect theory, developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, challenged the assumption that people always act rationally in decisions. Prospect theory demonstrates that our choices are shaped by cognitive biases and psychological tendencies. There are four major building blocks to prospect theory:

• Reference dependence is the idea that we don’t view gains or losses in concrete terms but rather by a reference point. For example, winning $100 would hold more value to someone making $10k annually than to someone making $1 million annually since the high-net-worth individual has a higher reference point for wealth and value.
  
  
• Diminishing sensitivity impacts the sense of value. The perceived value of a gain or loss decreases as the magnitude of the gain or loss increases. A demonstration of this is how a stock increasing from $10 to $20 seems more significant than one increasing from $110 to $120.
  
  
• Probability weighting is the overestimation of rare events. The best example of this is buying lottery tickets in the hopes of winning the big jackpot. The chances are minimal, but it’s still enough motivation for some to try anyway.
  
  
• Loss aversion is the idea that people experience losses more intensely than equivalent gains. This means that the fear of losing money often drives decision-making more than the potential for making money. An illustration of this is that people are typically more motivated to avoid losing $500 than to gain an extra $500. This can also be shown in the sunk cost fallacy where someone will continue to invest in something that is failing—against their better judgment—because avoiding the pain of loss is more motivating than experiencing the loss and starting again.

Behavioral Finance: The Biases Behind Our Financial Decisions

Building on prospect theory, behavioral finance emerged as a field that examines how psychological influences and biases impact financial decision-making. It recognizes that emotions and mental shortcuts, known as heuristics, often lead to irrational investment choices. Some of the most common biases affecting financial decisions include:

• Loss Aversion: As described above, the fear of losing money tends to overshadow the potential to make money. Investors focus more on avoiding losses than on maximizing gains, which can lead to overly conservative investment strategies.
  
  
• Mental Accounting: People assign different values to money depending on its source or intended use. For instance, someone might treat a $500 lottery win as “fun money” and spend it on entertainment rather than using it to pay off credit card debt.
  
  
• Confirmation Bias: We tend to seek out and favor information that aligns with our existing beliefs, making us more likely to ignore contradictory financial data.
  
  
• Herd Behavior: Many people follow the crowd, buying stocks when others are buying and selling when others are selling. This often leads to eventual market bubbles and crashes.

Understanding these biases can help individuals recognize their impact and take steps to counteract them when making financial decisions.

How Can Decision Theory Help You Make More Rational Financial Decisions?

The key to making smarter financial choices is recognizing the cognitive biases that may be influencing you. Here’s how decision theory can help:

1. Awareness is Power: Simply knowing that biases exist allows you to question your own instincts and approach decisions more analytically.
   
   
2. Take a Long-Term Perspective: Instead of reacting emotionally to market fluctuations, focus on long-term financial goals and strategies.
   
   
3. Use Objective Decision-Making Tools: Implementing systematic decision-making frameworks, such as risk assessment models, can reduce emotional decision-making.
   
   
4. Work with a Financial Advisor: A financial professional can provide an outside perspective, helping you avoid impulsive decisions driven by fear, overconfidence, or herd mentality. PFW Advisors understands your unique financial situation, and with our holistic approach, we can help you avoid irrational financial decisions while building your wealth.
   
   

While we may like to think we always act rationally when making financial decisions, the reality is that our choices are influenced by deep-seated psychological biases. Decision theory—and its offshoots like prospect theory and behavioral finance—helps us understand these biases and make more informed financial choices. By acknowledging our tendencies and working with financial advisors, we can take control of our financial future with greater clarity and confidence.

Investment advice offered through PFW Advisors, LLC, a Registered Investment Adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Any media logos and/or trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and no endorsement by PFW Advisors, LLC or its representatives is stated or implied. The information contained herein is for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, any tax, legal or investment advice. You are advised to seek the advice of a qualified professional prior to making any decision based on any specific information contained herein. The specific tax consequences of any investment or strategy will depend on your specific tax situation.

The links above are provided as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. When you access one of these websites, you are leaving our website and assume responsibility and risk for your use of the websites to which you are linking.